Terminology and Methodology Differences

This page compares TestFiesta’s terminology and workflows to TestRail’s, helping users adapt quickly.

TestFiesta enhances TestRail’s foundation with flexible organization, modern features, and agile workflows.

Terminology/Methodology Comparison

TestFiesta Term	TestRail Term	Terminology Difference	Methodology Difference
Tags	Tags	No difference in term, but implementation varies.	TestFiesta treats tags as first-class citizens, allowing tagging of nearly everything (cases, runs, plans, etc.). TestRail has limited or no prominent support for tags; custom fields may serve similar but less robust purposes.
Test Plans	Test Plans	No difference; both use "Test Plans".	Significant differences. In TestRail, plans are created by selecting runs and configurations, generating duplicate runs for each configuration (e.g., per browser). In TestFiesta, plans are more complex, allowing selection of multiple runs and configuration groups, manual addition of runs post-creation, individual updates to configurations on a run-by-run basis, and addition of milestones.
Test Executions	Tests	TestFiesta uses "Test Executions" while TestRail refers to them as "Tests" (individual instances within a test run corresponding to a test case).	Generally the same. Both represent instances of executing tests within runs, with statuses like Passed, Failed, etc.
Test Folders	Test Suites and Sections	TestFiesta uses "Test Folders" for organization, while TestRail uses "Test Suites and Sections".	TestFiesta employs simple folders for grouping test cases. TestRail uses a more structured hierarchy with suites (containers for test cases), sections, and sub-sections for specific modules or features.
Configurations	Configurations	Minimal difference; TestFiesta refers to "Configuration Groups" for multiple sets, but the base term is similar.	TestFiesta provides greater flexibility with multiple groups of variables (e.g., browsers, OS) that can be applied and updated per-run within plans. TestRail uses configurations (variables like OS or browsers) primarily to duplicate runs in plans for each combination.
Test Formats	Test Templates	TestFiesta uses "Test Formats" (in some places), while TestRail uses "Test Templates".	TestFiesta allows templates/formats for both test cases and tied results, offering more customization for result capturing. TestRail focuses on predefined structures for test cases (e.g., step-based or exploratory).
Test Milestones	Milestones	TestFiesta uses "Test Milestones", while TestRail uses "Milestones".	Generally the same. Both are key project events or releases (e.g., betas) for tracking progress, with test elements assignable to them.
Test Cases	Test Cases	No difference; both use "Test Cases".	Generally the same. Both consist of prerequisites, steps, and expected results, verifiable by a single tester to confirm specific functionality.
Test Runs	Test Runs	No difference; both use "Test Runs".	Generally the same. Both are executions of test cases or groups, where testers enter results, and can be assigned to milestones or included in plans.

Methodology Differences

Methodology	Difference
Organization	TestRail’s suites/sections are rigid; TestFiesta’s folders, tags, and shared steps enable dynamic scaling.
Workflow	Both use cases → runs → plans, but TestFiesta adds execution history, bulk actions, and matrix configurations. My Workspace streamlines tester tasks with to-do lists.
Collaboration	Workspaces and in-app feedback improve on TestRail’s email notifications. Audit logs ensure accountability.
Reporting	Customizable dashboards (charts, shared views) offer more flexibility than TestRail’s reports, with cross-project analytics (up to 5 projects).
Cost and Scale	Data management policies (auto-archive/delete) optimize performance, unlike TestRail’s enterprise focus.

TestFiesta’s agility and modern features make it ideal for TestRail users seeking efficiency.

Learn more about how TestFiesta implements automation click "Next" to open "API & Automation".